Perbedaan Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Kompetensi Preceptor Klinik Dan Preceptor Akademik pada Stase Keperawatan Dasar Profesi (KDP) Program Studi Ners Stikes Guna Bangsa Yogyakarta
Abstract
Background: Clinical practice in nursing is an opportunity for all students to translate theoretical knowledge into actual action. In the clinic environment, students jwill be motivated by the suitability of competencies carried out through active participation in clinical learning, while thinking, action, and professional attitudes are played by clinical counselors (preceptors).
Objective: To know the difference between student perceptions of clinical preceptor competency and academic preceptor on Basic Nursing Professional Stase.
Research Method: This type of research uses descriptive comparative with cross sectional method. The population of this study was all Ners profession students. The research sample amounted to 48 respondents taken using the total sampling technique. Data collection uses questionnaires and the results of statistical tests used are T-test analysis.
Results: Based on the research, students 'perceptions of clinical preceptor competency in the medium category were 32 (66.7%) and the students' perceptions of academic preceptor competencies in the high category were 26 (54.2%). The results of the analysis of the T test (t-test), obtained the value of tcount = 0.006. Thus the value of tcount <0.05, it is stated that the hypothesis Ha is accepted.
Conclusion: There is a difference between student perceptions of clinical preceptor competency and academic preceptor on Basic Nursing Professional Stase (KDP).
Downloads
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY), that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
